Archiv für den Tag 23. April 2013

Urteil: Iran – Homosexualität / Konversion

VG Trier: Ist die Homosexualität eines Mannes den Behörden bekannt, besteht die konkrete Gefahr von Misshandlungen. Es droht bei jedem Kontakt mit den Sicherheitsbehörden Inhaftierung oder Prügel­strafe, selbst wenn keine konkreten homosexuellen Handlungen nachgewiesen werden können (U.v. 17.01.2013 – 2 K 730/12.TR <5459455>).

VGH HE: Muslimische Konvertiten, die einer evan­gelikalen oder freikirchlichen Gruppierung angehö­ren, sind spätestens dann einer konkreten Gefahr für Leib, Leben und Freiheit ausgesetzt, wenn sie sich in Iran zu ihrem christlichen Glauben bekennen und Kontakt zu einer solchen Gruppierung aufnehmen. Für muslimische Konvertiten einer solchen Grup­pierung ist eine religiöse Betätigung selbst im häus­lich-privaten oder nachbarschaftlich-kommunika­tiven Bereich nicht mehr gefahrlos möglich. Dem gefährdeten Kreis zuzurechnen ist allerdings nur, wer sich ernsthaft dem neuen Glauben zugewandt hat, sich bei einer erzwungenen Rückkehr zu seinem christlichen Glauben bekennen und versuchen wür­de, Kontakt zu einer evangelikalen oder freikirchli­chen Gemeinde aufzunehmen (B.v. 11.02.2013 – 6 A 2279/12.Z.A <5416432>; st. Rspr., vgl. VGH HE, U.v. 18.11.2009 – 6 A 2105/08.A <5267255>).


Werden Sie Deutscher – ein Dokumentarfilm von Britt Beyer

Filmplakat des Kinofilms "Werden Sie Deutscher"Quelle: Marcus Lenz

Ein halbes Jahr lang begleitet der Film die Teilnehmer eines Integrationskurses an einer Berliner Volkshochschule, zeigt ihre persönlichen Motivationen und Mühen, und das Bild, das Deutschland in den Lehrmaterialien von sich selbst entwirft. Während auf der Leinwand Menschen aus aller Welt lernen was es heißt, deutsch zu sein, lernt der Zuschauer was es bedeutet, ein Immigrant in Deutschland zu sein. Und wird mit seinem Selbstbild als Deutscher konfrontiert. Das ist häufig komisch, manchmal absurd und erlaubt zum Teil auch Einblicke in tragische Situationen – ein Film, der Verständnis schafft und verbindet.

Lies den Rest dieses Beitrags

Four Prisoners Executed in Kerman (Southeastern Iran)

Iran Human Rights: Four prisoners were hanged in the prison of Kerman (southeastern Iran) early this morning.

According to the state run Iranian news agency Fars, three of the prisoners were convicted of participation in possession of 121 kilograms of morphine and 440 grams of opium, while the fourth prisoner was convicted of trafficking of 5475 grams of heroin and 6440 grams of opium, said the report. None of the prisoners were identified by name.

According to Iran Human Rights’ annual report on the death penalty in 2012, at least 76% of all those executed in 2012 were charges with drug related charges. IHR has received many reports on unfair trials, torture and forced confessions in the drug-related cases.

Five Prisoners among them two Afghan citizens were hanged in the prison of Zahedan, according to the website of the „Human rights and democracy activists in Iran“ (HRDAI). The report has not been confirmed by the official sources.





[English] [فارسى]

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2012: Iran

The Islamic Republic of Iran is a theocratic republic established after the 1979 adoption of a constitution by popular referendum. The constitution, amended in 1989, created a political system based on the concept in Shia Islam of velayat-e faqih, the “guardianship of the jurist” or “rule by the jurisprudent.” Shia clergy and political leaders vetted by the clergy, many of which are increasingly associated with the country’s security forces, dominate key power structures. The “leader of the revolution” (or supreme leader) is chosen by a popularly elected body of 86 clerics, the Assembly of Experts, and directly controls the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government, as well as the armed forces. The supreme leader also indirectly controls internal security forces and other key institutions. Since 1989 the supreme leader has been Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The March 2 legislative elections for the 290-seat Islamic Consultative Assembly were generally considered neither free nor fair. Civilian authorities failed at times to maintain effective control over the security forces.

The government continued its crackdown on civil society, which intensified after the disputed 2009 presidential elections. The government and its security forces pressured, intimidated, and arrested journalists, students, lawyers, artists, women, ethnic and religious activists, and members of their families. The judiciary continued to harshly punish, imprison, or detain without charges human rights activists, members of the political opposition, and persons linked to reform movements. The government significantly increased its surveillance and monitoring of citizens’ online activities by blocking or filtering content and detaining numerous Internet users for content posted online.

The most egregious human rights problems were the government’s severe limitations on citizens’ right to peacefully change their government through free and fair elections; restrictions on civil liberties, including the freedoms of assembly, speech, and press; and the government’s disregard for the physical integrity of persons whom it arbitrarily and unlawfully killed, tortured, and imprisoned.

Other reported human rights problems included: disappearances; cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment, including judicially sanctioned amputation and flogging; politically motivated violence and repression, such as beatings and rape; harsh and life-threatening conditions in detention and prison facilities, with instances of deaths in custody; arbitrary arrest and lengthy pretrial detention, sometimes incommunicado; continued impunity of security forces; denial of fair public trials, sometimes resulting in executions without due process; political prisoners and detainees; the lack of an independent judiciary; ineffective implementation of civil judicial procedures and remedies; arbitrary interference with privacy, home, and correspondence; severe restrictions on freedoms of speech (including via the Internet) and press; harassment of journalists; censorship and media content restrictions; severe restrictions on academic freedom; severe restrictions on the freedoms of assembly, association, and religion; some restrictions on freedom of movement; official corruption and lack of government transparency; constraints on investigations of international organizations and nongovernmental organizations (NGO) into alleged violations of human rights; legal and societal discrimination and violence against women, children, ethnic and religious minorities, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons based on perceived sexual orientation and gender identity; incitement to anti-Semitism and trafficking in persons; and severe restrictions on the exercise of labor rights.

The government took few steps to prosecute, punish, or otherwise hold accountable officials who committed abuses. Members of the security forces detained in connection with abuses were frequently released soon after their arrest, and judicial officials did not prosecute offenders. Impunity remained pervasive throughout all levels of government and the security forces.

Note: This report draws heavily on non-U.S. government sources. The United States does not have an embassy in Iran. Lies den Rest dieses Beitrags

%d Bloggern gefällt das: